The best Side of pld case laws

These provisions utilize to cases where evidence was recorded after the QSO's enforcement, even if the transaction occurred prior to its promulgation. Read more

In Dosso's case (1958), the Pakistan Supreme Court used jurist Hans Kelsen's theory that a revolution can be justified when The fundamental norm underlying a Constitution disappears and also a new system is put in its place.

As the Supreme Court is definitely the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has actually been reached, therefore the decision with the Supreme Court needs to be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) of the Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more

Persuasive Authority – Prior court rulings that may very well be consulted in deciding a current case. It might be used to guide the court, but just isn't binding precedent.

As a result, the petition and any related applications are dismissed. The Petitioner needs to go after his remedy through an appeal before the competent authority. If this kind of an appeal hasn't yet been decided, it should be addressed. Following that decision, the Petitioner may then find further recourse before the Service Tribunal. Read more

In order to preserve a uniform enforcement of your laws, the legal system adheres into the doctrine of stare decisis

PLR is really a revolutionizing platform democratizing and making legal research easy and accessible in Pakistan :

S. Supreme Court. Generally speaking, proper case citation includes the names of your parties to the initial case, the court in which the case was heard, the date it was decided, along with the book in which it really is recorded. Different citation requirements may include things like italicized or underlined text, and certain specific abbreviations.

161 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming towards the main case, Additionally it is a perfectly-founded proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence within the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty from the charge, however, that is matter on the procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-recognize the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings around the evidence.

five hundred,000/- (Rupees 5 hundred thousand only) each along with the same shall be held from the police station on the effect that no harm shall be caused to the petitioners. five. In view of the above, this Constitutional Petition is disposed of Read more

182 . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi As far as the stance from the respondents that pensionary benefits may very well be withheld on account with the allegations leveled against the petitioner, in our view, section twenty in the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does give for certain circumstances under more info which a civil servant's pension may be withheld or reduced. These incorporate if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension could be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a serious crime, their pension could possibly be withheld or reduced. In certain cases, a civil servant's pension may be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions set because of the government.

Problems or Errors If you encounter any technical problems with this website (for instance a lousy link or simply a portion of the opinion lacking), please notify the eService Middle.

Preceding four tax years interpreted. It isn't from the date of finalisation of audit but from the tax year involved. Read more

These judicial interpretations are distinguished from statutory law, which are codes enacted by legislative bodies, and regulatory legislation, which are set up by executive organizations based on statutes.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *